4.6 Review

The Staphylococcus aureus CC398 Lineage: An Evolution Driven by the Acquisition of Prophages and Other Mobile Genetic Elements

期刊

GENES
卷 12, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/genes12111752

关键词

Staphylococcus aureus; CC398; evolution; prophages; mobile genetic elements

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [310030_197734]
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [310030_197734] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The CC398 lineage of Staphylococcus aureus, initially described as livestock colonizers, has now been found to cause severe infections in humans, even in patients without contact with animals. Recent studies suggest that CC398 strains are evolving towards increased virulence and antibiotic resistance.
Among clinically relevant lineages of Staphylococcus aureus, the lineage or clonal complex 398 (CC398) is of particular interest. Strains from this lineage were only described as livestock colonizers until 2007. Progressively, cases of infection were reported in humans in contact with farm animals, and now, CC398 isolates are increasingly identified as the cause of severe infections even in patients without any contact with animals. These observations suggest that CC398 isolates have spread not only in the community but also in the hospital setting. In addition, several recent studies have reported that CC398 strains are evolving towards increased virulence and antibiotic resistance. Identification of the origin and emergence of this clonal complex could probably benefit future large-scale studies that aim to detect sources of contamination and infection. Current evidence indicates that the evolution of CC398 strains towards these phenotypes has been driven by the acquisition of prophages and other mobile genetic elements. In this short review, we summarize the main knowledge of this major lineage of S. aureus that has become predominant in the human clinic worldwide within a single decade.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据