4.6 Article

Genome-Wide Analysis of DNA Methylation in Buccal Cells of Children Conceived through IVF and ICSI

期刊

GENES
卷 12, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/genes12121912

关键词

assisted reproduction; children; DNA methylation; methylation array; culture medium

资金

  1. Agence Nationale pour la Recherche (CARE-ANR JCJC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the DNA methylation profiles of 7-8-year-old children conceived through assisted reproductive technology (ART) or naturally, and found that ART-conceived children displayed limited genome-wide DNA methylation variation compared to naturally conceived children. The mode of conception did not significantly affect DNA methylation differences in childhood.
Early life periconceptional exposures during assisted reproductive technology (ART) procedures could alter the DNA methylation profiles of ART children, notably in imprinted genes and repetitive elements. At the genome scale, DNA methylation differences have been reported in ART conceptions at birth, but it is still unclear if those differences remain at childhood. Here, we performed an epigenome-wide DNA methylation association study using Illumina InfiniumEPIC BeadChip to assess the effects of the mode of conception on the methylome of buccal cells from 7- to 8-year-old children (48 children conceived after ART or naturally (control, CTL)) and according to the embryo culture medium in which they were conceived. We identified 127 differentially methylated positions (DMPs) and 16 differentially methylated regions (DMRs) (FDR < 0.05) with low delta beta differences between the two groups (ART vs. CTL). DMPs were preferentially located inside promoter proximal regions and CpG islands and were mostly hypermethylated with ART. We highlighted that the use of distinct embryo culture medium was not associated with DNA methylation differences in childhood. Overall, we bring additional evidence that children conceived via ART display limited genome-wide DNA methylation variation compared with those conceived naturally.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据