4.6 Article

PRKG2 Splice Site Variant in Dogo Argentino Dogs with Disproportionate Dwarfism

期刊

GENES
卷 12, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/genes12101489

关键词

Canis lupus familiaris; linkage analysis; homozygosity mapping; whole genome sequencing; bone; growth; development

资金

  1. Kennel Club Charitable Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated two Dogo Argentino dogs with disproportionate dwarfism, finding evidence suggesting a potential genetic defect in the PKRG2 gene as the likely cause for this phenotype.
Dwarfism phenotypes occur in many species and may be caused by genetic or environmental factors. In this study, we investigated a family of nine Dogo Argentino dogs, in which two dogs were affected by disproportionate dwarfism. Radiographs of an affected dog revealed a decreased level of endochondral ossification in its growth plates, and a premature closure of the distal ulnar physes. The pedigree of the dogs presented evidence of monogenic autosomal recessive inheritance; combined linkage and homozygosity mapping assigned the most likely position of a potential genetic defect to 34 genome segments, totaling 125 Mb. The genome of an affected dog was sequenced and compared to 795 control genomes. The prioritization of private variants revealed a clear top candidate variant for the observed dwarfism. This variant, PRKG2:XM_022413533.1:c.1634+1G > T, affects the splice donor site and is therefore predicted to disrupt the function of the PKRG2 gene encoding protein, kinase cGMP-dependent type 2, a known regulator of chondrocyte differentiation. The genotypes of the PRKG2 variant were perfectly associated with the phenotype in the studied family of dogs. PRKG2 loss-of-function variants were previously reported to cause disproportionate dwarfism in humans, cattle, mice, and rats. Together with the comparative data from other species, our data strongly suggest PRKG2:c.1634+1G > T to be a candidate causative variant for the observed dwarfism phenotype in Dogo Argentino dogs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据