4.7 Article

Emodin Interferes With Nitroglycerin-Induced Migraine in Rats Through CGMP-PKG Pathway

期刊

FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY
卷 12, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.758026

关键词

emodin; anti-migraine; CGRP; c-fos; cGMP-PKG pathway

资金

  1. Research on Modernization of Traditional Chinese Medicine [2018YFC1707105]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This research demonstrated that emodin can alleviate nitroglycerin-induced migraine in rats by reducing levels of nitric oxide, calcitonin gene-related peptide, substance P, tumor necrosis factor, and cyclic guanosine monophosphate, as well as inhibiting the expression of c-Fos positive cells. Emodin may act through the cGMP-PKG pathway to relieve migraine.
The purpose of this research was to explore the effect and mechanism of emodin in interfering with nitroglycerin-induced migraine rats. We carried out behavioral research within 2 h post-nitroglycerin (NTG) injection, and blood samples were collected through the abdominal aorta for measurements of nitric oxide (NO), calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), substance P (SP), tumor necrosis factor (TNF-alpha) and cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) levels. Immunohistochemistry was adopted to detect the activation of c-Fos immunoreactive neurons in brain tissues. The number and integrated optical density (IOD) of c-Fos positive cells were measured using Image-Pro Plus. Western blotting was applied to detect the levels of PKG protein in rat brain tissues. The results showed that emodin can alleviate the pain response of migraine rats and significantly reduce the levels of NO, CGRP, SP, TNF-alpha and cGMP in migraine rats. In addition, emodin can significantly reduce the number of c-Fos positive cells and the IOD value. Moreover, the expression of PKG protein was significantly inhibited by emodin. Therefore, it is inferred that emodin can relieve migraine induced by NTG through the cGMP-PKG pathway, and can be used as a potential botanical medicine for the treatment of migraine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据