4.7 Article

Aberrant Expression of ADARB1 Facilitates Temozolomide Chemoresistance and Immune Infiltration in Glioblastoma

期刊

FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY
卷 13, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.768743

关键词

glioblastoma; temozolomide; ADARB1; akt; immune

资金

  1. Science and Technology Innovation Program of Hunan Province [2021RC3029]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81803035]
  3. Postdoctoral Science Foundation of Central South University [248485]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research has shown that ADARB1 is upregulated in glioblastoma tissues and cells and is associated with AKT-mediated TMZ resistance. It has also been suggested that ADARB1 may be involved in the mitochondrial respiratory chain complex and plays a role in tumor-immune system interactions in GBM.
Chemoresistance, especially temozolomide (TMZ) resistance, is a major clinical challenge in the treatment of glioblastoma (GBM). Exploring the mechanisms of TMZ resistance could help us identify effective therapies. Adenosine deaminases acting on RNA (ADARs) are very important in RNA modification through regulating the A-to-I RNA editing. Recent studies have shown that ADARs regulate multiple neurotransmitter receptors, which have been linked with the occurrence and progress of GBM. Here, data from several bioinformatics databases demonstrated that adenosine deaminase RNA specific B1 (ADARB1), also named ADAR2, was upregulated in both GBM tissues and cells, and had the prognostic value in GBM patients. Moreover, ADARB1 was found to be involved in AKT-mediated TMZ resistance in GBM cells. The KEGG analysis of ADARB1-associated co-expressed genes showed that ADARB1 was potentially involved in the mitochondrial respiratory chain complex. TISIDB and GEPIA databases were further used to analyze the role of ADARB1 in tumor-immune system interactions in GBM. These findings deepened our understanding of the function of ADARB1 in tumorigenesis and therapeutic response in GBM.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据