4.6 Article

Kinetics and Mechanism of Aniline and Chloroanilines Degradation Photocatalyzed by Halloysite-TiO2 and Halloysite-Fe2O3 Nanocomposites

期刊

CATALYSTS
卷 11, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/catal11121548

关键词

photodegradation; TiO2-; Fe2O3-halloysite nanocomposites; aniline; chloroanilines kinetics

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Higher Education [SUPB.RN.21.188]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The photocatalytic degradation kinetics of aniline and its derivatives were studied under different photocatalysts, with complete degradation observed after 300 minutes. The higher adsorption capacity and immobilization of TiO2 and Fe2O3 on the halloysite surface in nanocomposites significantly increased the photocatalytic activity compared to commercial catalysts.
The kinetics of photocatalytic degradation of aniline, 2-chloroaniline, and 2,6-dichloroaniline in the presence of halloysite-TiO2 and halloysite-Fe2O3 nanocomposites, halloysite containing naturally dispersed TiO2, Fe2O3, commercial TiO2, P25, and alpha-Fe2O3 photocatalysts, were investigated with two approaches: the Langmuir-Hinshelwood and first-order equations. Adsorption equilibrium constants and adsorption enthalpies, photodegradation rate constants, and activation energies for photocatalytic degradation were calculated for all studied amines photodegradation. The photodegradation mechanism was proposed according to organic intermediates identified by mass spectrometry and electrophoresis methods. Based on experimental results, it can be concluded that after 300 min of irradiation, aniline, 2-chloro-, and 2,6-dichloroaniline were completely degraded in the presence of used photocatalysts. Research results allowed us to conclude that higher adsorption capacity and immobilization of TiO2 and Fe2O3 on the halloysite surface in the case of halloysite-TiO2 and halloysite-Fe2O3 nanocomposites significantly increases photocatalytic activity of these materials in comparison to the commercial photocatalyst: TiO2, Fe2O3, and P25.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据