4.6 Article

Mixed Metal Oxides of M1 MoVNbTeOx and TiO2 as Composite Catalyst for Oxidative Dehydrogenation of Ethane

期刊

CATALYSTS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/catal12010071

关键词

ODHE; ethylene; mixed metal oxides; MoVNbTeOx; TiO2

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21776156]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Composite catalysts of M1-TiO2 were prepared by two methods and showed improved catalytic performance in the ODHE process. The introduction of TiO2 increased the V5+ content on the catalyst surface and the reactivity of active oxygen species, contributing to the promotion of catalytic performance.
Composite catalysts of mixed metal oxides were prepared by mixing a phase-pure M1 MoVNbTeOx with anatase-phase TiO2. Two methods were used to prepare the composite catalysts (the simple physically mixed or sol-gel method) for the improvement of the catalytic performance in the oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane (ODHE) process. The results showed that TiO2 particles with a smaller particle size were well dispersed on the M1 surface for the sol-gel method, which presented an excellent activity for ODHE. At the same operating condition (i.e., the contact time of 7.55 g(cat)center dot h/mol(C2H6) and the reaction temperature of 400 degrees C), the M1-TiO2-SM and M1-TiO2-PM achieved the space time yields of 0.67 and 0.52 kg(C2H4)/kg(cat)/h, respectively, which were about ~76% and ~35% more than that of M1 catalyst (0.38 kg(C2H4)/kg(cat)/h), respectively. The BET, ICP, XRD, TEM, SEM, H-2-TPR, C2H6-TPSR, and XPS techniques were applied to characterize the catalysts. It was noted that the introduction of TiO2 raised the V5+ abundance on the catalyst surface as well as the reactivity of active oxygen species, which made contribution to the promotion of the catalytic performance. The surface morphology and crystal structure of used catalysts of either M1-TiO2-SM or M1-TiO2-PM remained stable as each fresh catalyst after 24 h time-on-stream tests.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据