4.6 Article

Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging predicts clinicopathological parameters and stages of endometrial carcinomas

期刊

CANCER MEDICINE
卷 11, 期 4, 页码 993-1004

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4486

关键词

endometrial carcinoma; magnetic resonance image; metastasis; stage

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study confirmed that preoperative MRI can be an effective tool for predicting pathological parameters and stages of endometrial endometrioid carcinoma, especially in excluding intra-abdominal metastatic disease.
Background We investigated the agreement and accuracy of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with postoperative pathological characteristics and stages of endometrial endometrioid carcinoma (EEC). Methods We recruited 527 women with EEC who underwent staging surgery at a single medical institution. The preoperative MRI, stages, and clinical and pathological parameters, including myometrial invasion (MI), cervical invasion (CI), adnexal metastasis (AM), intra-abdominal metastasis, and pelvic and/or para-aortic nodal metastasis, were recorded and analyzed. The agreement and accuracy between the preoperative MRI findings and these parameters and stages were assessed. Results The rate of the preoperative MRI-based clinical stage matching the postoperative surgical stage was 85.2% in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IA, 51.9% in stage IB, 35.5% in stage II, 5.3% in stage IIIA, 33.3% in stage IIIB, 28.6% in stage IIIC1, 64.3% in stage IIIC2, and 93.8% in stage IVB. The consistency between radiologists and pathologists was 80.5% for deep MI, 91.5% for cervical invasion, 92.2% for adnexal metastasis, 98.9% for intra-abdominal metastasis, and 87.5% and 92.2% for pelvic and para-aortic nodal metastases, respectively. The negative predictive value of intra-abdominal metastasis was the highest with 99.8%. Conclusions Preoperative MRI could be an excellent tool for routine preoperative assessment to predict pathological parameters and stages of EEC, especially in excluding intra-abdominal metastatic disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据