4.6 Article

Impact of Barrett oesophagus diagnoses and endoscopies on oesophageal cancer survival in the UK: A cohort study

期刊

CANCER MEDICINE
卷 11, 期 4, 页码 1160-1171

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4484

关键词

Barrett oesophagus; lead-time bias; oesophageal cancer; relative survival; surveillance

类别

资金

  1. Cancer Research UK [C8162/A16892, C8162/A25356]
  2. MRC [RG84369]
  3. Cancer Research UK Population Research Catalyst award [C8640/A23385]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that patients with a prior diagnosis of Barrett esophagus had a survival advantage in esophageal cancer and adenocarcinoma cohorts, even if they had fewer endoscopies. This survival benefit was not fully explained by surveillance endoscopies.
Background Current guidelines recommend endoscopic surveillance for Barrett oesophagus (BE), but the value of surveillance is still debated. Using a combination of primary care, secondary care and cancer registry datasets, we examined the impact of a prior BE diagnosis, clinical and risk factors on survival from oesophageal cancer and adenocarcinoma. Methods Retrospective cohort study of patients aged 50 and above diagnosed with malignant oesophageal cancer between 1993 and 2014 using Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD). All prior BE diagnoses and endoscopies were identified from CPRD and Hospital Episode Statistics. Histology information was obtained from linked cancer registry data. We used flexible parametric models to estimate excess hazard ratios (EHRs) for relative survival. We simulated the potential impact of lead-time by adding random lead-times from a variety of distributions to all those with prior BE. Results Among our oesophageal cancer (n = 7503) and adenocarcinoma (n = 1476) cohorts only small percentages, 3.4% and 5.3%, respectively, had a prior BE diagnosis. Two-year relative survival was better among patients with BE: 48.0% (95% CI 41.9-54.9) compared to 25.2% (24.3-26.2) without. Patients with BE had a better prognosis (EHR = 0.53, 0.41-0.68). Survival was higher even if patients with BE had fewer than two endoscopies (50.0%; 43.6-57.3). A survival benefit was still observed after lead-time adjustment, with a 20% absolute difference in 2-year survival using a 5 year mean sojourn time. Conclusions Patients with a prior BE diagnosis had a survival advantage. This was not fully explained by surveillance endoscopies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据