4.6 Article

Locating Single-Atom Optical Picocavities Using Wavelength-Multiplexed Raman Scattering

期刊

ACS PHOTONICS
卷 8, 期 10, 页码 2868-2875

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsphotonics.1c01100

关键词

plasmonics; picocavity; adatom; SERS; localization spectroscopy

资金

  1. European Research Council (ERC) under Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme PICOFORCE [883703]
  2. EPSRC (Cambridge NanoDTC) [EP/L015978/1, EP/L027151/1, EP/S022953/1, EP/P029426/1, EP/R020965/1]
  3. Trinity College, University of Cambridge
  4. Leverhulme Trust
  5. Isaac Newton Trust
  6. European Research Council (ERC) under Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme POSEIDON [861950]
  7. EPSRC [EP/R020965/1, EP/S022953/1, EP/P029426/1, EP/L027151/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study reveals that light suppresses the local effective barrier height for adatom formation, and that the initial barrier height is decreased by reduced atomic coordination numbers near facet edges. Modeling the system also resolves the frequency-dependent picocavity field enhancements supported by these atomic scale features.
Transient atomic protrusions in plasmonic nanocavities confine optical fields to sub-1-nm(3) picocavities, allowing the optical interrogation of single molecules at room temperature. While picocavity formation is linked to both the local chemical environment and optical irradiation, the role of light in localizing the picocavity formation is unclear. Here, we combine information from thousands of picocavity events and simultaneously compare the transient Raman scattering arising from two incident pump wavelengths. Full analysis of the data set suggests that light suppresses the local effective barrier height for adatom formation and that the initial barrier height is decreased by reduced atomic coordination numbers near facet edges. Modeling the system also resolves the frequency-dependent picocavity field enhancements supported by these atomic scale features.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据