4.6 Article

Gap Size-Dependent Plasmonic Enhancement in Electroluminescent Tunnel Junctions

期刊

ACS PHOTONICS
卷 9, 期 2, 页码 688-693

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsphotonics.1c01757

关键词

electroluminescence; nanojunctions; scanning tunneling microscope; tunnel junctions; gold point contacts

资金

  1. National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate Fellowship
  2. Center for Precision Assembly of Superstratic and Superatomic Solids at Columbia University
  3. NSF MRSEC [DMR-1420634]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, Au tunnel junctions are used to simultaneously probe electroluminescence and conductance. It is found that plasmonic enhancement increases with decreasing gap size for junctions biased between 1.4 and 1.8 V, while above 1.9 V, plasmonic enhancement decreases due to quenching caused by tunneling, which is consistent with trends observed for high energy plasmons in scattering experiments.
Nanoscale plasmonic structures have been primarily characterized through scattering studies, but electroluminescence offers an exciting alternative from a technological standpoint by removing the need for optical excitation. In sub-nanometer biased junctions, electronic tunneling can serve as the excitation source for plasmon- coupled electroluminescence, but the gap size dependence to this plasmonic enhancement has not been characterized. Here, we simultaneously probe the electroluminescence and conductance of Au tunnel junctions. We find that plasmonic enhancement increases as the gap size is reduced for junctions biased between 1.4 and 1.8 V, consistent with the behavior of charge transfer plasmons. At biases above 1.9 V, we see decreasing plasmonic enhancement with the decreasing gap, showing quenching due to tunneling in remarkable agreement with the trends observed for high energy plasmons in scattering experiments. Critically, we find that plasmonic enhancement of electroluminescence is gap size-dependent and, furthermore, is in agreement with the nature of modes excited by scattering.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据