4.5 Article

Harmonic and Vibration Analysis of Dual Three-Phase PMSM with One-Phase Open Circuit Fault

期刊

SYMMETRY-BASEL
卷 14, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/sym14020290

关键词

subdomain method; open circuit fault; harmonic analysis; electromagnetic vibration; dual three-phase motor

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51807194, 2021Z125]
  2. Ningbo Science and technology innovation [2020Z067]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper analyzes the harmonics and vibration of a dual three-phase permanent magnet synchronous motor (PMSM) under different fault-tolerant current control when one-phase winding is an open circuit fault. By establishing a subdomain model and analyzing the working conditions, the accuracy and effectiveness of the calculation method are verified.
This paper analyzes the harmonics and vibration under different fault-tolerant current control when one-phase winding of dual three-phase permanent magnet synchronous motor (PMSM) is an open circuit fault. Firstly, the dual three-phase load condition subdomain model of breadloaf surface-mounted permanent magnet (PM) PMSM is established. Secondly, the working conditions of an open circuit fault of one-phase winding are set from the perspectives of no fault-tolerant (NFT) control, maximum torque (MT) control, minimum copper loss (MCL) control and single three-phase mode (STPM) control. The torque harmonics and electromagnetic force harmonics of the four working conditions are analyzed. Then, considering the multi-physical field of electromagnetic and structural coupling, the electromagnetic force in the motor air gap acts on the stator core, and the vibration under four different working conditions is calculated and analyzed. Through the comparison between the analytical method and finite element method, the accuracy of the established model is verified. The calculation method is effective and accurate, it can quickly predict the motor performance in case of one-phase open circuit fault of dual three-phase PMSM.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据