4.5 Article

Entropy as Measure of Brain Networks' Complexity in Eyes Open and Closed Conditions

期刊

SYMMETRY-BASEL
卷 13, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/sym13112178

关键词

entropy; eyes; EEG; brain network

资金

  1. Italian Ministry of Health for Institutional Research (Ricerca corrente)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Brain complexity can be revealed through comparison of EEG signals during resting with eyes open and closed. Entropy, particularly ApEn, was used to measure system disorder and showed higher values in networks with eyes open. The study suggests that complexity of brain dynamics depends on individual brain state.
Brain complexity can be revealed even through a comparison between two trivial conditions, such as eyes open and eyes closed (EO and EC respectively) during resting. Electroencephalogram (EEG) has been widely used to investigate brain networks, and several non-linear approaches have been applied to investigate EO and EC signals modulation, both symmetric and not. Entropy is one of the approaches used to evaluate the system disorder. This study explores the differences in the EO and EC awake brain dynamics by measuring entropy. In particular, an approximate entropy (ApEn) was measured, focusing on the specific cerebral areas (frontal, central, parietal, occipital, temporal) on EEG data of 37 adult healthy subjects while resting. Each participant was submitted to an EO and an EC resting EEG recording in two separate sessions. The results showed that in the EO condition the cerebral networks of the subjects are characterized by higher values of entropy than in the EC condition. All the cerebral regions are subjected to this chaotic behavior, symmetrically in both hemispheres, proving the complexity of networks dynamics dependence from the subject brain state. Remarkable dynamics regarding cerebral networks during simple resting and awake brain states are shown by entropy. The application of this parameter can be also extended to neurological conditions, to establish and monitor personalized rehabilitation treatments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据