4.5 Article

Limb Preference in Animals: New Insights into the Evolution of Manual Laterality in Hominids

期刊

SYMMETRY-BASEL
卷 14, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/sym14010096

关键词

handedness; grasping; gesture; brain asymmetry; vertebrates; invertebrates; primates; ontogeny; evolution

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article summarizes the study on human handedness and highlights the value of functional neuroimaging and developmental approaches in understanding the mechanisms underlying human handedness.
Until the 1990s, the notion of brain lateralization-the division of labor between the two hemispheres-and its more visible behavioral manifestation, handedness, remained fiercely defined as a human specific trait. Since then, many studies have evidenced lateralized functions in a wide range of species, including both vertebrates and invertebrates. In this review, we highlight the great contribution of comparative research to the understanding of human handedness' evolutionary and developmental pathways, by distinguishing animal forelimb asymmetries for functionally different actions-i.e., potentially depending on different hemispheric specializations. Firstly, lateralization for the manipulation of inanimate objects has been associated with genetic and ontogenetic factors, with specific brain regions' activity, and with morphological limb specializations. These could have emerged under selective pressures notably related to the animal locomotion and social styles. Secondly, lateralization for actions directed to living targets (to self or conspecifics) seems to be in relationship with the brain lateralization for emotion processing. Thirdly, findings on primates' hand preferences for communicative gestures accounts for a link between gestural laterality and a left-hemispheric specialization for intentional communication and language. Throughout this review, we highlight the value of functional neuroimaging and developmental approaches to shed light on the mechanisms underlying human handedness.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据