4.6 Article

Influence of Temperature in Degradation of Organic Pollution Using Corona Discharge Plasma

期刊

SUSTAINABILITY
卷 13, 期 23, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su132312971

关键词

corona discharge plasma; dye decolorization; nonthermal plasma; pin-to-plate electrodes

资金

  1. Taif University Researchers Supporting Project, Taif, Saudi Arabia [TURSP-2020/32]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The temperature of dye solution affects the removal efficiency of water-soluble and anionic acid dyes, with a specific dye showing better decolorization within a certain temperature range. A simulation model was introduced to analyze the effects of corona discharge plasma, showing a good match between experimental and simulated results. The pseudo-first-order model was found to best fit the experimental data among different reaction kinetics models.
Dye solution temperature influences the elimination efficiency of water-soluble and anionic acid dye. Acid Blue 25 dye, using a gas-liquid electrical discharge system, was successfully investigated. The results showed an increase in the percentage of dye decolorization from 91.16% to 96.12% when the dye solution temperature was increased from 278 K to 308 K. However, the initial dye decolorization percentage was decreased with the further increase in dye solution temperature from 318 K to 358 K. The 2D simulation model was introduced to consider the influence of temperature and the electric field generated by corona discharge plasma in air and water. Results also showed a great match between the experimental and the simulation results. The reaction rates of dye degradation were analyzed using the Arrhenius equation. Furthermore, pseudo-zero-, pseudo-first-, and pseudo-second-order models were used to determine the reaction kinetics. The best fit for the experimental data would follow the pseudo-first-order model. Finally, electrical energy per order, energy yield, and experimental degradation data were calculated to investigate the cost analysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据