4.6 Article

Does Digital Inclusive Finance Narrow the Urban-Rural Income Gap through Primary Distribution and Redistribution?

期刊

SUSTAINABILITY
卷 14, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su14042120

关键词

digital inclusive finance (DIF); urban-rural income gap; primary distribution (PD); redistribution (RD); mediating effect model

资金

  1. National Social Science Fund of China [20AZD115]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper empirically studies the impact of digital inclusive finance on the urban-rural income gap in China. The results show that digital inclusive finance has a narrowing effect on the income gap, both in terms of primary distribution and redistribution. Specifically, narrowing the income gap in primary distribution has a mediating effect on the overall urban-rural income gap, while narrowing the income gap in redistribution does not. Countermeasures are proposed for digital inclusive finance based on these findings.
Excessive income gap (IG) between urban and rural areas harms the quality of economic development, and imbalanced primary distribution (PD) as well as redistribution (RD) are considered to be the main factors contributing to the urban-rural IG. Does digital Inclusive Finance (DIF) affect the urban-rural IG through PD and RD? This paper empirically studies the impact of digital inclusive finance on Chinese urban-rural IG from the perspectives of PD and RD respectively, through updated and comprehensive provincial data, using the method of mediating effect. The results show that DIF narrowed China's urban-rural IG with regional differences. Meanwhile, DIF also narrowed the urban-rural IGs in PD and RD, both with regional heterogeneity. Moreover, narrowing the urban-rural IG of PD exerted a mediating effect on the general urban-rural IG, while narrowing the urban-rural IG of RD did not. The results are helpful for DIF to better narrow urban-rural IG. Therefore, countermeasures are put forward for DIF to apply from the perspectives of PD and RD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据