4.6 Article

Heritage as Action Research

期刊

SUSTAINABILITY
卷 14, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su14010282

关键词

cultural heritage; landscape; knowledge transfer; sustainable development; social innovation; tourism; impact assessment

资金

  1. Spanish Science and Innovation Ministry project Economias locales, economia imperial: El occidente de la Peninsula Iberica (Siglos II A.C.-II D.C.) (LOKI) [PID2019-104297GB-I00]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper explores the importance of archaeology in society, emphasizing the significance of heritage values as a means of conveying its impact to the public. It highlights the need to balance the protection of heritage with the evolving and negotiated nature of these values. The paper argues that archaeologists should play a role in facilitating local communities' deeper understanding of their past, enabling social innovation and sustainable development.
This paper intends to weigh the importance of archaeology by how much impact it has, or could have, on society. Heritage values are precisely the language in which that impact translates to the general public. It is necessary, however, to balance the duty to protect heritage with the mutating and negotiated nature of these values. Archaeologists should not be seen as the wardens but rather as the enablers, the midwives, of local communities coming to terms with a deeper understanding of their past. The more effectively this heritage stimulates the relation of the community with these values, the greater the potential it will have to stimulate social innovation, which is the foundation for sustainable development or abandonment. For many the boon of cultural heritage is tourism, and this is true but to an insufficient extent. In order to be sustainable, tourism must be part of a broader social innovation strategy that foregoes easy pickings in favor of the creation of quality brands, employment, and the protection of traditional lifeways. Only in this way can heritage truly unlock a sustainable horizon.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据