4.6 Article

Implementing and Monitoring Circular Business Models: An Analysis of Italian SMEs

期刊

SUSTAINABILITY
卷 14, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su14010270

关键词

circular economy; sustainability; SMEs; survey; awareness; benefits; barriers; circular economy-related KPIs; reporting on circular economy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the state of the circular economy among Italian SMEs, finding cultural, technological, market, and financial barriers. To promote circular economy, intervention by public institutions, trade associations, and the higher education system is recommended.
The transition from a linear to a circular economy (CE) is at the center of the debate among institutions, enterprises, practitioners, and scholars. Small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), with their high presence in the business environment, play a pivotal role in the successful implementation of CE principles. Therefore, this paper aims to understand the state of the CE among Italian SMEs, considering both their different sizes and sectors. This study investigates CE knowledge and application, strategic relevance, benefits from and barriers to the transition towards circular business models, and the use of CE-related performance indicators in management control and external reporting. Through an online survey carried out in cooperation with the Italian Confederation of Craft Trades and Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises (CNA), we collected primary data from 623 respondents. Findings revealed the existence of cultural, technological, market and financial barriers, which have hampered the adoption of circular practices among Italian SMEs. Poor understanding of CE potential, combined with difficulty in raising public and private funds to finance the transition from linear to circular, are the greatest problems. To overcome such issues, we recommend serious intervention by public institutions, trade and consumer associations, and the higher education system to develop a climate more favorable to the CE.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据