4.6 Article

People's Perception of Experimental Installations for Sustainable Energy: The Case of IFMIF-DONES

期刊

SUSTAINABILITY
卷 14, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su14020899

关键词

sustainable development; psychosocial risks; socioeconomic impact; nuclear facilities

资金

  1. European Commission [870186]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nuclear facilities are a main milestone in the journey towards sustainable energy, with cleaner, more efficient, and almost unlimited energy sources like nuclear fusion presenting a major challenge for the future. While experimental installations to control nuclear power are proliferating globally, doubts persist among citizens regarding the expected benefits and potential hazards of these facilities.
Nuclear facilities are a main milestone in the long way to sustainable energy. Beyond the well-known fission centrals, the necessity of cleaner, more efficient and almost unlimited energy reducing waste to almost zero is a major challenge in the next decades. This is the case with nuclear fusion. Different experimental installations to definitively control this nuclear power are proliferating in different countries. However, citizens in the surroundings of cities and villages where these installations are going to be settled are frequently reluctant because of doubts about the expected benefits and the potential hazards. In this framework, knowing the opinion of people and their perception of experimental fusion facilities is essential for researchers, administrations and rulemaking bodies planning future fusion plants. This is the case for IFMIF-DONES, a neutron irradiation facility to determine the most suitable materials for the future fusion reactors. The construction of this installation is starting in Escuzar (Granada, Spain), and this work presents a large survey among 311 people living or working in the village. Their perception, fears, hopes and other variables are analyzed, and the conclusions for future installations and their impact on the energy policy are presented.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据