4.6 Article

Climate Smart Regenerative Agriculture to Produce Sustainable Beauty Products: The Case Study of Snail Secretion Filtrate (LX360(R))

期刊

SUSTAINABILITY
卷 14, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su14042367

关键词

circular economy; cosmetics; carbon sequestration; Helix aspersa muller; soil restoration; carbon footprint

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In recent years, the environmental impacts of cosmetics production have gained attention, leading to a need for more sustainable ingredients. This study evaluates the environmental impact of snail secretion filtrate as an alternative cosmetic ingredient and finds that the application of regenerative agriculture positively affects soil organic carbon sequestration.
In the last years, the environmental impacts of cosmetics production have received growing interest from consumers, industries and the scientific community. Therefore, the selection and evaluation of more sustainable ingredients for cosmetic preparations need greater attention. The purpose of this work was to evaluate the environmental impact of snail secretion filtrate (LX360(R)), which could be used as an alternative cosmetic ingredient. The Carbon Footprint (CF) was used to quantify the kgCO(2)eq per liter of the LX360(R) produced in a rearing system farm that follows circularity economy and regenerative agriculture principles. The study computes the soil organic carbon (SOC) stock change due to the implementation of regenerative agricultural practices. The CF of the production system was up to 1.76 kg CO(2)eq L-1, where the extraction stage contributed most. Findings on SOC stock showed a significant increase compared to the previous land-use. The net sequestered CO2 into the soil amounts to 2.07 kg CO(2)eq L-1; therefore, the production of LX360(R) showed a positive carbon balance (0.31 kg CO(2)eq L-1). The application of regenerative agriculture in snail rearing systems positively affects SOC sequestration, and it should be considered as a best management practice for the restoration of degraded land.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据