4.5 Article

Soil pH alters the biological parameters of cowpea aphid Aphis craccivora Koch (Hemiptera: Aphididae) on its host plant Vicia faba

期刊

SAUDI JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
卷 29, 期 4, 页码 2926-2932

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2022.01.021

关键词

Plant-insect interaction; Plant quality; Plant defense; Aphis craccivora; Soil acidity

类别

资金

  1. Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia [TURSP-2020/92]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Soil pH can affect the growth and reproduction of cowpea aphids on bean seedlings. The performance of aphids is worse in a suitable pH range but uniformly low under unfavorable extreme pH conditions, except for the case of pH 8.1 where the best reproduction was observed.
The biotic and abiotic factors including the agricultural implementation can modify soil acidification. We hypothesized that soil pH should as repercussion, alter the plant physiological and physical properties and eventually affect insect herbivores including agricultural pests. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of seven levels of soil pH on the performance of cowpea aphid Aphis craccivora on Vicia faba. Significant relationships between soil pH and growth of host bean seedlings or development and reproduction of the aphid were detected. Data demonstrated significant differences in the total longevity, the pre-reproductive, reproductive, post-reproductive and pre-viviparity periods. Within a suitable range of pH for bean growth between pH 5.3 and pH 7.2, the aphid performance was worse on seedlings growing better, however, under unfavorable extreme pH conditions, plant quality measured as height did not affect the aphids anymore and their performance was uniformly low except the case in pH 8.1 condition in which the best aphid reproduction was observed. The results confirm that soil pH affect the performance of cowpea aphid A. craccivora and also exhibited strong influence on the growth of broad bean plants. (C) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of King Saud University.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据