4.5 Article

Experimental and theoretical analyses of nano-silver for antibacterial activity based on differential crystal growth temperatures

期刊

SAUDI JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
卷 28, 期 12, 页码 7561-7566

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.09.058

关键词

Antibacterial assay; E. coli; Nano-silver; Solution evaporation method

类别

资金

  1. King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia [RSP-2021/397]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the antibacterial potential of nano-silver synthesized at different concentrations and temperatures, revealing that the crystal structure, surface morphology, and spectral properties of nano-silver are associated with its antibacterial activity.
The modulation of antimicrobial properties of nanomaterials can be achieved through various physical and chemical processes, which ultimately affect subsequent properties. In this study, the antibacterial potential of nano-silver was investigated at 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 g/L, and its differential temperature synthesis was achieved at 20, 50, and 70 degrees C using the solvent evaporation method. Nano-silver particles exhibited FCC (octahedral) crystalline structure with crystallite sizes ranging between 28 and 39 nm calculated using XRD analysis. Moreover, irregular and non-uniform surface morphology was evident from SEM micrographs. The UV-Vis absorbance spectrum of nano-silver exhibited wave maxima at 433 nm, while the FTIR analysis depicted different modes of vibration indicating the CH, OH, C C, C-Cl, and CH2 functional groups attached to the surface. Lastly, nano-silver caused prominent inhibition (12.5 mm) in the Escherichia coli growth, particularly at 70 degrees C synthesis temperature and 3.0 g/L dose. It is concluded that both the nano-silver crystal growth temperature and dose contributed substantially to bacterial growth inhibition linked with subsequent size, shape-dependent properties. (C) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of King Saud University.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据