4.5 Article

How rare and common risk variation jointly affect liability for autism spectrum disorder

期刊

MOLECULAR AUTISM
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13229-021-00466-2

关键词

Genomic-Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (G-BLUP); De novo mutation; Liability; Polygenic risk score; Autism spectrum disorder

资金

  1. National Institute of Mental Health [R37MH057881, R01MH097849, U01MH111661, U01MH111658]
  2. Simons Foundation [SF575547]
  3. Seaver Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study explored how rare and common genetic variations jointly affect liability for individuals with ASD. ASD subjects have a greater burden of genetic risk variants compared to control subjects, and carriers of potentially damaging variants fall between non-carrier ASD subjects and control subjects. The effects of common and rare variants likely combine additively to determine individual-level liability.
Background Genetic studies have implicated rare and common variations in liability for autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Of the discovered risk variants, those rare in the population invariably have large impact on liability, while common variants have small effects. Yet, collectively, common risk variants account for the majority of population-level variability. How these rare and common risk variants jointly affect liability for individuals requires further study. Methods To explore how common and rare variants jointly affect liability, we assessed two cohorts of ASD families characterized for rare and common genetic variations (Simons Simplex Collection and Population-Based Autism Genetics and Environment Study). We analyzed data from 3011 affected subjects, as well as two cohorts of unaffected individuals characterized for common genetic variation: 3011 subjects matched for ancestry to ASD subjects and 11,950 subjects for estimating allele frequencies. We used genetic scores, which assessed the relative burden of common genetic variation affecting risk of ASD (henceforth burden), and determined how this burden was distributed among three subpopulations: ASD subjects who carry a potentially damaging variant implicated in risk of ASD (PDV carriers); ASD subjects who do not (non-carriers); and unaffected subjects who are assumed to be non-carriers. Results Burden harbored by ASD subjects is stochastically greater than that harbored by control subjects. For PDV carriers, their average burden is intermediate between non-carrier ASD and control subjects. Both carrier and non-carrier ASD subjects have greater burden, on average, than control subjects. The effects of common and rare variants likely combine additively to determine individual-level liability. Limitations Only 305 ASD subjects were known PDV carriers. This relatively small subpopulation limits this study to characterizing general patterns of burden, as opposed to effects of specific PDVs or genes. Also, a small fraction of subjects that are categorized as non-carriers could be PDV carriers. Conclusions Liability arising from common and rare risk variations likely combines additively to determine risk of any individual diagnosed with ASD. On average, ASD subjects carry a substantial burden of common risk variation, even if they also carry a rare PDV affecting risk.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据