4.3 Article

Glutamine functionalized iron oxide nanoparticles for high-performance carbon dioxide absorption

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2021.104081

关键词

Glutamine; NPs; CO2 capture; CO2 absorption; Fe2O3

资金

  1. Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran [7134851154]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mitigating CO2 emission using functionalized Iron Oxide nanofluid showed higher absorption rates at high pressures. The experimental results indicated that Fe2O3@glutamine nanofluid significantly improved CO2 absorption compared to water and Fe2O3 nanofluid, with an enhancement up to 33.93% at the best operational conditions.
Mitigating carbon dioxide (CO2) emission via novel methods is crucial due to the harmful effects of greenhouse gases (GHGs) on global climate change. In this research, CO2 absorption was carried out using functionalized Iron Oxide (Fe2O3) nanofluid. Glutamine as a powerful chemical absorbent of CO2 was functionalized on Fe2O3 nanoparticles (NPs) to improve CO2 capture of water-based Fe2O3 nanofluid. To demonstrate the capability of prepared nanofluids on CO2 absorption, a high-pressure batch setup was utilized to run absorption experiments. Subsequently, the impacts of pressure, NPs concentration, functionalization, and NPs dispersibility on CO2 capture were evaluated. The experimental results explicitly demonstrated that water/water-based nanofluids result in higher CO2 absorption rates at higher pressures (40 bar). Moreover, the experimental data confirmed that Fe2O3@glutamine nanofluid improves CO2 absorption significantly higher than water and Fe2O3 nanofluid. Ultimately, Fe2O3@glutamine nanofluid enhanced CO2 capture up to 33.93 and 13.22% compared to water and Fe2O3 nanofluid at the best operational conditions (40 bar and optimal NPs concentrations). Furthermore, transmission electron microscopy (TEM), scanning electron microscope (SEM), fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) and zeta potential analysis were conducted to elucidate the synthesized NPs characteristics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据