4.3 Article

Simultaneous determination of the effective stress coefficients for permeability and volumetric strain on a tight sandstone

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2021.104186

关键词

Gas transport; Apparent permeability; Klinkenberg effect; Isostatic test; Tight sandstone; Effective stress; Volumetric strain

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) [392108477]
  2. Alexandra Amann Hilden brand

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gas transport processes in low-permeable sandstones at elevated pore pressures involve a combination of fluid-dynamic and rock-mechanical stress effects. Permeability experiments with gas and volumetric strain measurements were used to assess the interdependency of both processes. The results showed that the modified effective stress laws and a clay-shell pore structure model were effective in describing the interrelated changes in permeability and bulk volume with respect to pore and confining pressure.
Gas transport processes in low-permeable (tight) sandstones at elevated pore pressures involve a combination of fluid-dynamic (slip flow) and poro-elastic or rock-mechanical stress (pore and bulk compressibility) effects. To assess the interdependency of both processes, permeability experiments with gas (argon) were combined with volumetric strain measurements. The flow studies were performed under controlled effective stress (10, 20 and 30 MPa) with pore and confining pressures up to 30 and 50 MPa, respectively. The results of the permeability and strain measurements could only be described by the modified effective stress laws for apparent permeability coefficients (chi = 1.25) and volumetric strain (Biot alpha = 0.7), respectively. Measured apparent permeability coefficients (similar to 10-(18) m(2)) were implemented into a permeability model considering both gas and stress effects individually. A clay-shell pore structure model was used to describe the interrelated changes in permeability and bulk volume with respect to pore and confining pressure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据