4.7 Review

Engineering of small-molecule lipidic prodrugs as novel nanomedicines for enhanced drug delivery

期刊

JOURNAL OF NANOBIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 20, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12951-022-01257-4

关键词

Cancer; Small molecule; Lipidic prodrug; Nanomedicine; Drug delivery

资金

  1. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [LY18H300004, LY15H300001]
  2. Clinical research project of Zhejiang Medical Association [2021ZYC-Z02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lipidic prodrugs are an effective strategy to optimize the properties of therapeutic agents in cancer treatment, improving their physicochemical properties and antitumor activities while reducing systemic toxicity. However, the rational design of small-molecule lipidic prodrugs has not received enough attention. This review provides an overview of conjugation strategies for small-molecule lipidic prodrugs fabrication and highlights their rational design in response to physiological barriers of chemotherapeutic agents.
A widely established prodrug strategy can effectively optimize the unappealing properties of therapeutic agents in cancer treatment. Among them, lipidic prodrugs extremely uplift the physicochemical properties, site-specificity, and antitumor activities of therapeutic agents while reducing systemic toxicity. Although great perspectives have been summarized in the progress of prodrug-based nanoplatforms, no attention has been paid to emphasizing the rational design of small-molecule lipidic prodrugs (SLPs). With the aim of outlining the prospect of the SLPs approach, the review will first provide an overview of conjugation strategies that are amenable to SLPs fabrication. Then, the rational design of SLPs in response to the physiological barriers of chemotherapeutic agents is highlighted. Finally, their biomedical applications are also emphasized with special functions, followed by a brief introduction of the promising opportunities and potential challenges of SLPs-based drug delivery systems (DDSs) in clinical application.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据