4.6 Article

Highly dispersed Pt nanoparticles on 2D MoS2 nanosheets for efficient and stable hydrogen evolution reaction

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 10, 期 10, 页码 5273-5279

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1ta10725a

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1632265]
  2. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [YDZX20203100001438]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A facile route to fabricate Pt-NP-dispersed MoS2 nanosheets with enhanced electrocatalytic performance for hydrogen evolution reaction has been reported. The addition of NaBH4 as the assistant reductant allows the spontaneous reduction of H2PtCl6, resulting in the formation of abundant catalytically active sites.
The dispersion of noble metal nanoparticles (NPs) over the surface of two-dimensional (2D) transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs) creates an efficient electrocatalytic framework which combines the superior catalytic capability of noble metal NPs with the large accessible surface area of 2D TMDs. Here, we report a facile route to fabricate Pt-NP-dispersed MoS2 nanosheets (E-MoS2-Pt-r) whose electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution reaction performance exceeds that of the commercial Pt/C catalyst. The spontaneous reduction of H2PtCl6 by electrochemically exfoliated MoS2 (E-MoS2) can be regulated by the assistant reductant NaBH4. By adding NaBH4, small and highly dispersed Pt NPs are formed on E-MoS2 nanosheets which provide abundant catalytically active sites. The E-MoS2-Pt-r electrode shows an overpotential of 38 mV at a current density of 10 mA cm(-2) and the Pt-like catalytic kinetics with a Tafel slope of 29 mV dec(-1). It also demonstrates exceptional electrocatalytic stability, which shows no decay for 1000 cycles of cyclic voltammetry tests and maintains a stable current density at a constant overpotential of 50 mV for 10 hours. Furthermore, the mass activity of Pt in E-MoS2-Pt-r is enhanced nearly six times as compared to that of the Pt/C catalyst.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据