4.6 Review

Structural design and mechanism analysis of hierarchical porous carbon fibers for advanced energy and environmental applications

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 10, 期 1, 页码 10-49

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1ta08646d

关键词

-

资金

  1. Alfred Deakin Postdoctoral Fellowship from Deakin University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hierarchical porous carbon fibers (PCFs) have combined the features of commercial carbon fibers and porous materials for a range of applications. Developing strategies to enhance their properties and understanding their mechanism are crucial for future advancements.
Hierarchical porous carbon fibers (PCFs) combining the structural and functional features of commercial carbon fibers and porous carbonaceous materials have attracted extensive interest in energy conversion/storage, catalysis, adsorption/separation, sensing and other applications. The structures, morphologies and compositions of PCFs and the incorporation of active materials are considered crucial to boost their performance in the energy and environmental fields. However, for PCFs, as relatively new materials, their synthetic routes and characteristic development are still limited. This review focuses on the structural design and mechanism analysis of PCFs with five major porous structures and their superior application profiles. Firstly, we summarize the primary strategies to access and control the porosities and morphologies of PCFs. Subsequently, the improvement mechanisms of the performance of PCFs in various applications are comprehensively discussed, and emerging strategies to further enhance their properties by utilizing the synergistic effect with heteroatom doping and guest active material hybridization are highlighted. Finally, this review demonstrates the major challenges in the structural design and mechanism exploration of PCFs for different applications and provides an overall perspective for the future development of advanced PCF-based devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据