4.6 Article

Sorption-tree with scalable hygroscopic adsorbent-leaves for water harvesting

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 10, 期 12, 页码 6576-6586

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2ta00484d

关键词

-

资金

  1. Shanghai Agriculture Applied Technology Development Program of China [2019-02-08-00-08-F01124]
  2. Foundation for Innovative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [51521004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sorption-based atmospheric water harvesting (SAWH) is a promising method for overcoming water scarcity in arid areas. Researchers have developed a three-dimensional sorption-tree to improve sorption capacity and increase solar utilization efficiency. In experiments, the sorption-tree achieved remarkable water productivity, which can meet daily water demand.
Sorption-based atmospheric water harvesting (SAWH), as a promising method of overcoming water scarcity in arid areas, has attracted increasing attention. Numerous excellent adsorbents have been developed to exercise their vast potential. However, in terms of device design, the conventional structure that stacks vast adsorbents into a plane not only worsens the material's heat and mass transfer properties but also impairs systemic solar utilization, both of which impede the practical application of SAWH. To break through this limitation, a three-dimensional sorption-tree with omnidirectional lighting has been promoted, inspired by natural trees. A scalable hygroscopic complex (RH 20-80%: 0.5-2.3 g g(-1)) is developed as the adsorbent leaf to be decorated spatially on the sorption-tree. This design could boost integral sorption kinetics without sacrificing material capacity, while guaranteeing solar utilization efficiency in variable solar altitudes. In outdoor experiments, the sorption-tree's sorption capacity improved by 200-300%, and remarkable water productivity of up to similar to 3200 ml per m(2) per day was achieved, which could fully satisfy the daily water demand of an adult.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据