4.6 Article

Phase formation and performance of solid state reactive sintered Ce0.8Gd0.2O2-δ-FeCo2O4 composites

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 10, 期 5, 页码 2412-2420

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1ta05695f

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) [387282673]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Reactive sintering of Ce0.8Gd0.2O2-δ-FeCo2O4 composites leads to the formation of desired mixed ionic electronic conductivity, with the specific microstructure playing a crucial role in membrane performance.
Reactive sintering of dual phase composites for use as oxygen transport membranes is a promising method enabling lower sintering temperatures as well as low-cost raw materials. Ce0.8Gd0.2O2-delta-FeCo2O4 composites with different nominal weight ratios from 60 : 40 to 90 : 10 are processed by reactive sintering of commercial Ce0.8Gd0.2O2-delta, Fe2O3, and Co3O4 powders. The phases formed in situ during sintering are investigated qualitatively and quantitatively by means of XRD and Rietveld refinement as well as transmission electron microscopy. Besides gadolinia-doped ceria, two Fe/Co-spinel phases are in equilibrium in agreement with the phase diagram. Moreover, a donor-doped GdFeO3-based perovskite (Gd,Ce)(Fe,Co)O-3 showing electronic conductivity is formed. Due to these intense phase reactions, the composition of each individual phase is assessed for all composites and their functional properties are discussed. The oxygen permeation performances of the composites are measured including their dependence on temperature and the potential limiting steps are discussed. The results reveal that the phase reactions support the formation of the desired mixed ionic electronic conductivity achieving percolation at low nominal spinel contents. The specific microstructure plays an extremely important role in the membrane performance and, thus, special attention should be paid to this in future research about dual phase membranes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据