4.6 Article

Enhancing organic photovoltaic performance with 3D-transport dual nonfullerene acceptors

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 10, 期 4, 页码 1948-1955

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1ta09106a

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSFC [22105189, 21734001, 51973031, 21875182]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China [201822002, 202112020]
  3. Key Scientific and Technological Innovation Team Project of Shaanxi Province [2020TD-002]
  4. 111 Project 2.0 [BP2018008]
  5. Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Utilizing dual nonfullerene acceptors Y6:FINIC and polymer donor PM6, we fabricated efficient organic solar cells with improved charge transport and enhanced performance. The compatibility of FINIC with PM6 and Y6 contributed to efficient charge transport, resulting in increased power conversion efficiency in both sequential-process heterojunction and bulk heterojunction OSCs.
We used dual nonfullerene acceptors Y6:FINIC with 3D charge transport features and polymer donor PM6 to fabricate sequential-process heterojunction (SHJ) and bulk heterojunction (BHJ) organic solar cells (OSCs). FINIC has good compatibility with PM6 and Y6, facilitating efficient charge transport. It enhances photon absorption and electron transport, and reduces non-radiative recombination loss, contributing to increased V-OC, J(SC) and FFs in both SHJ and BHJ OSCs. Moreover, the SHJ film has a more uniform FINIC vertical distribution and more PM6 at the bottom part of the films relative to the BHJ film, warranting better charge transport and collection. Finally, the SHJ OSCs based on Y6:FINIC yield power conversion efficiency (PCE) as high as 17.8%, higher than that of the BHJ counterpart (16.9%). Both SHJ and BHJ devices based on Y6:FINIC dual acceptors show higher PCEs than Y6-based binary OSCs (16.3% for the SHJ and 16.0% for the BHJ) and FINIC-based binary OSCs (13.4% for SHJ and 13.1% for BHJ).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据