4.6 Article

N, P, and S co-doped 3D porous carbon-architectured cathode for high-performance Zn-ion hybrid capacitors

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 10, 期 12, 页码 6489-6498

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2ta00202g

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21875253]
  2. CAS-Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO) [121835KYSB20200039]
  3. Scientific Research and Equipment Development Project of CAS [YJKYYQ20190007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a hierarchical porous carbon sphere (HPCS) co-doped with N, P and S is developed, which features a three-dimensional porous frame structure to enhance conductivity and provide fast kinetics and short mass transfer pathways. The Zn-ion hybrid capacitors (ZIHCs) using HPCS-900 as the cathode material exhibit high capacity, excellent energy density and power density. The HPCS-900 also shows high stability with a capacity retention of 95.24% after 30,000 cycles.
Zinc (Zn) ion hybrid capacitors (ZIHCs) are promising energy storage devices with the integrated merits of high-capacity Zn-ion batteries and high-power supercapacitors. Their practical application yet remains a challenge due to the relatively low energy density and poor longevity. Herein, a hierarchical porous carbon sphere (HPCS) co-doped with N, P and S is developed, which is featured with a three-dimensional (3D) porous frame structure to deliver a short mass transfer pathway, fast kinetics and enhanced conductivity. The ZIHCs with HPCS-900 as the cathode material enables a large capacity of 104.7 mA h g(-1) and excellent energy/power density of 90.17 W h kg(-1)/81.2 W kg(-1) within the voltage window of 0.1-1.7 V. The HPCS-900-based ZIHCs affords a high stability up to 30 000 cycles with a high capacity retention of 95.24%. The HPCS-900 coupled soft-pack ZIHC device exhibits high capacity, high-rate capability and high stability, indicating the great potential of ZIHCs in practical applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据