4.4 Article

The FL bound and its phenomenological implications

期刊

JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
卷 -, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP10(2021)009

关键词

Black Holes; Black Holes in String Theory; Cosmology of Theories beyond the SM; Flux compactifications

资金

  1. KU Leuven C1 [ZKD1118C16/16/005]
  2. FWO fellowship
  3. National Science Foundation [NSF PHY2013858]
  4. Simons Foundation [602883]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper establishes the Festina Lente (FL) bound with a fixed constant, explores its extensions in various scenarios, and discusses its phenomenological implications. Evidence is provided that the FL bound may have impacts even when gravity is decoupled in certain situations.
Demanding that charged Nariai black holes in (quasi-)de Sitter space decay without becoming super-extremal implies a lower bound on the masses of charged particles, known as the Festina Lente (FL) bound. In this paper we fix the O(1) constant in the bound and elucidate various aspects of it, as well as extensions to d > 4 and to situations with scalar potentials and dilatonic couplings. We also discuss phenomenological implications of FL including an explanation of why the Higgs potential cannot have a local minimum at the origin, thus explaining why the weak force must be broken. For constructions of metastable dS involving anti-brane uplift scenarios, even though the throat region is consistent with FL, the bound implies that we cannot have any light charged matter fields coming from any far away region in the compactified geometry, contrary to the fact that they are typically expected to arise in these scenarios. This strongly suggests that introduction of warped anti-branes in the throat cannot be decoupled from the bulk dynamics as is commonly assumed. Finally, we provide some evidence that in certain situations the FL bound can have implications even with gravity decoupled and illustrate this in the context of non-compact throats.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据