4.4 Article

Tropical fans, scattering equations and amplitudes

期刊

JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
卷 -, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP11(2021)071

关键词

Differential and Algebraic Geometry; Scattering Amplitudes

资金

  1. ERC [648630 IQFT]
  2. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [724638]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper describes a family of tropical fans related to Grassmannian cluster algebras, which are connected to the kinematic space of massless scattering processes in various ways. The focus is on finite Grassmannian cluster algebras, explaining how face variables for the cluster polytopes are related to the scattering equations. For Grassmannians Gr(4, n), the described tropical fans are related to the singularities of loop amplitudes in planar N = 4 super Yang-Mills theory. Each choice of tropical fan leads to a natural class of polylogarithms, and the currently known loop data fit into this classification.
We describe a family of tropical fans related to Grassmannian cluster algebras. These fans are related to the kinematic space of massless scattering processes in a number of ways. For each fan associated to the Grassmannian Gr(k, n) there is a notion of a generalised phi(3) amplitude and an associated set of scattering equations which further generalise the Gr(k, n) scattering equations that have been recently introduced. Here we focus mostly on the cases related to finite Grassmannian cluster algebras and we explain how face variables for the cluster polytopes are simply related to the scattering equations. For the Grassmannians Gr(4, n) the tropical fans we describe are related to the singularities (or symbol letters) of loop amplitudes in planar N = 4 super Yang-Mills theory. We show how each choice of tropical fan leads to a natural class of polylogarithms, generalising the notion of cluster adjacency and we describe how the currently known loop data fit into this classification.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据