4.4 Article

Quantum de Sitter horizon entropy from quasicanonical bulk, edge, sphere and topological string partition functions

期刊

JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
卷 -, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP01(2022)088

关键词

Models of Quantum Gravity; Space-Time Symmetries; Higher Spin Symmetry; Topological Strings

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Motivated by the prospect of constraining microscopic models, this study calculates the exact one-loop corrected de Sitter entropy for every effective field theory of quantum gravity. It establishes a universal relationship between the sphere partition function and the quotient of a quasi-canonical bulk and a Euclidean edge partition function. The study also reveals the exponential landscape of de Sitter vacua and the connection between dS, AdS(+/-), and conformal results in generic higher-spin gravity. Holography is exhibited in quasi-exact bulk-edge cancellation.
Motivated by the prospect of constraining microscopic models, we calculate the exact one-loop corrected de Sitter entropy (the logarithm of the sphere partition function) for every effective field theory of quantum gravity, with particles in arbitrary spin representations. In doing so, we universally relate the sphere partition function to the quotient of a quasi-canonical bulk and a Euclidean edge partition function, given by integrals of characters encoding the bulk and edge spectrum of the observable universe. Expanding the bulk character splits the bulk (entanglement) entropy into quasinormal mode (quasiqubit) contributions. For 3D higher-spin gravity formulated as an sl(n) Chern-Simons theory, we obtain all-loop exact results. Further to this, we show that the theory has an exponentially large landscape of de Sitter vacua with quantum entropy given by the absolute value squared of a topological string partition function. For generic higher-spin gravity, the formalism succinctly relates dS, AdS(+/-) and conformal results. Holography is exhibited in quasi-exact bulk-edge cancelation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据