Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes for Responders Versus Non-Responders Following Renal Denervation in Resistant Hypertension

Background Recent trial results support the efficacy of renal sympathetic denervation in lowering blood pressure (BP). While BP reduction in general is associated with a clinically meaningful reduction in cardiovascular events and mortality, such a relationship has not been described for patients undergoing renal sympathetic denervation. Methods and Results Clinical events were assessed in patients who underwent renal sympathetic denervation at our center using telephone- and clinical follow-up, interviews with general practitioners, as well as review of hospital databases. Event rates were compared between BP responders (>= 5 mm Hg 24-hour ambulatory BP reduction) and non-responders; 296 patients were included. Compared with baseline, 24-hour systolic ambulatory BP was reduced by 8.3 +/- 12.2 mm Hg and diastolic BP by 4.8 +/- 7.0 mm Hg (P<0.001 for both) after 3 months. One hundred eighty patients were classified as BP responders and 116 as non-responders. During a median follow-up time of 48 months, significantly less major adverse cardiovascular events (cardiovascular death, stroke, myocardial infarction, critical limb ischemia, renal failure) occurred in responders than in non-responders (22 versus 23 events, hazard ratio [HR], 0.53 [95% CI, 0.28 to 0.97], P=0.041). This was consistent after adjustment for potential confounders as well as confirmed by propensity-score matching. A proportional relationship was found between BP reduction after 3 months and frequency of major adverse cardiovascular events (HR, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.58 to 0.97] per 10 mm Hg 24-hour systolic ambulatory BP reduction). Conclusions Based on these observational data, blood pressure response to renal sympathetic denervation is associated with improved long-term clinical outcome.

Automated summary

Observational data indicates that blood pressure response to renal sympathetic denervation is associated with improved long-term clinical outcomes. The study found that patients who responded to the treatment had significantly fewer major adverse cardiovascular events during a median follow-up period of 48 months compared to non-responders.