4.4 Article

Performance Analysis of Learning From Demonstration Approaches During a Fine Movement Generation

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON HUMAN-MACHINE SYSTEMS
卷 51, 期 6, 页码 653-662

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/THMS.2021.3107523

关键词

Cooperative robot tool (CRT); kinesthetic teaching; learning from demonstration (LfD); submillimeter accuracy; teleoperation; visual enhancement

资金

  1. Slovenian Research Agency [P2-0228]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study compares different Learning from Demonstration approaches in fine movement generation, finding that the Cooperative Robot Tool method outperforms others; additionally, the visual enhancement and spatial scaling features significantly impact the performance of all approaches.
Learning from demonstration (LfD) is a well-establishedmethod of movement demonstration; however, the performance of different LfD approaches during a fine movement generation is still unknown. In this study, we compare kinesthetic teaching, teleoperation, and cooperative robot tool approaches on two different tasks, where a submillimeter accuracy is required. Additionally, we analyze the influence of a visual enhancement feature on each of the approaches and the influence of a spatial scaling feature on the teleoperation approach. The participants are a well-balanced group (regarding age, gender, and expertise), with 65% having no previous experience using robots. In our study, we found that all approaches achieved a submillimeter median positioning error. However, when no additional features are used, the cooperative robot tool (CRT) approach outperforms other approaches since it consistently achieves the lowest positioning error. Besides the positioning error, the generated velocity and the participants' feedback (via a questionnaire) also indicates that it is the most suitable approach for an accurate submillimeter movement generation. We also concludes that the visual enhancement feature and the spatial scaling feature has a significant influence on the performance of all approaches. When the two features are used, the generated positioning error drops considerably. When the visual enhancement feature is used, kinesthetic teaching performs in some cases as good as the CRT approach, while the teleoperation with the spatial scaling feature approach in some cases even outperforms the CRT approach. However, we still consider the CRT to be the best approach for fine movement generation since these features cannot be used in every possible scenario.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据