4.6 Review

Viruses Run: The Evasion Mechanisms of the Antiviral Innate Immunity by Hantavirus

期刊

FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY
卷 12, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.759198

关键词

hantavirus; immune evasion; IFN; PRR; cell death; antiviral innate immunity

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation [81772167, 81971563]
  2. Key Research and Development Project of Shaanxi Province [2019ZDLSF02-03]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hantavirus has evolved various strategies to evade the host's immune surveillance, including interfering with the Interferon-I (IFN-I) signaling pathway, regulating cell death and cell stress, and upregulating immune checkpoint molecules to interfere with viral infections. Understanding these antiviral immune evasion mechanisms will deepen our understanding of hantavirus pathogenesis and help develop more effective control and elimination methods.
Hantavirus can cause hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome (HFRS) in Eurasia and hantavirus pulmonary syndrome (HPS) in America, with high mortality and unknown mechanisms. Innate immunity is the host's first-line defense to bridge the acquired immunity against viral infections. However, hantavirus has evolved various strategies in both molecular and cellular aspects to evade the host's natural immune surveillance. The Interferon-I (IFN-I) signaling pathway, a central link of host defense, induces various antiviral proteins to control the infection. This paper summarizes the molecular mechanisms of hantavirus evasion mechanisms of the IFN signaling pathway and cellular processes such as regulated cell death and cell stress. Besides, hantavirus could also evade immune surveillance evasion through cellular mechanisms, such as upregulating immune checkpoint molecules interfering with viral infections. Understanding hantavirus's antiviral immune evasion mechanisms will deepen our understanding of its pathogenesis and help us develop more effective methods to control and eliminate hantavirus.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据