4.7 Review

Innate Lymphoid Cells and Natural Killer Cells in Bacterial Infections: Function, Dysregulation, and Therapeutic Targets

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.733564

关键词

innate lymphoid cells (ILCs); natural killer cells (NKs); bacterial infection; mucosal immunity; intracellular bacteria; extracellular bacteria

资金

  1. University of Sharjah

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Infectious diseases, particularly bacterial infections, pose a significant global medical challenge, with the innate lymphoid cells (ILCs) playing a crucial role in defense against these infections. However, bacteria have evolved methods to evade the host immune system, leading to infection spread and tissue damage.
Infectious diseases represent one of the largest medical challenges worldwide. Bacterial infections, in particular, remain a pertinent health challenge and burden. Moreover, such infections increase over time due to the continuous use of various antibiotics without medical need, thus leading to several side effects and bacterial resistance. Our innate immune system represents our first line of defense against any foreign pathogens. This system comprises the innate lymphoid cells (ILCs), including natural killer (NK) cells that are critical players in establishing homeostasis and immunity against infections. ILCs are a group of functionally heterogenous but potent innate immune effector cells that constitute tissue-resident sentinels against intracellular and extracellular bacterial infections. Being a nascent subset of innate lymphocytes, their role in bacterial infections is not clearly understood. Furthermore, these pathogens have developed methods to evade the host immune system, and hence permit infection spread and tissue damage. In this review, we highlight the role of the different ILC populations in various bacterial infections and the possible ways of immune evasion. Additionally, potential immunotherapies to manipulate ILC responses will be briefly discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据