4.8 Article

Connexins evolved after early chordates lost innexin diversity

期刊

ELIFE
卷 11, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

eLIFE SCIENCES PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.74422

关键词

gap junction evolution; innexin; pannexin; connexin; N-glycosylation; None

类别

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [Schu1470/8 491183248]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gap junction channels are formed by two unrelated protein families, with non-chordates using innexins and chordates using connexins. Surprisingly, glycosylated innexins are not unique to chordates, as they are also found in non-chordates. The loss of innexin diversity during early chordate evolution and the presence of only one glycosylated innexin in lancelets, which lack connexins, suggest a bottleneck effect and explain why connexins have become the exclusive protein for chordate gap junctions.
Gap junction channels are formed by two unrelated protein families. Non-chordates use the primordial innexins, while chordates use connexins that superseded the gap junction function of innexins. Chordates retained innexin-homologs, but N-glycosylation prevents them from forming gap junctions. It is puzzling why chordates seem to exclusively use the new gap junction protein and why no chordates should exist that use non-glycosylated innexins to form gap junctions. Here, we identified glycosylation sites of 2388 innexins from 174 non-chordate and 276 chordate species. Among all chordates, we found not a single innexin without glycosylation sites. Surprisingly, the glycosylation motif is also widespread among non-chordate innexins indicating that glycosylated innexins are not a novelty of chordates. In addition, we discovered a loss of innexin diversity during early chordate evolution. Most importantly, lancelets, which lack connexins, exclusively possess only one highly conserved innexin with one glycosylation site. A bottleneck effect might thus explain why connexins have become the only protein used to form chordate gap junctions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据