4.8 Article

Inflammasome activation leads to cDC1-independent cross-priming of CD8 T cells by epithelial cell-derived antigen

期刊

ELIFE
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

eLIFE SCIENCES PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.72082

关键词

inflammasome; antigen presentation; intestinal epithelial cells; adaptive immunity; Mouse

类别

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [AI063302, AI155634, 5T32GM007232]
  2. Howard Hughes Medical Institute Investigator Award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study demonstrates that activation of inflammasomes in intestinal epithelial cells can initiate adaptive immune responses by activating CD8(+) T cells. However, cross-presentation of IEC-derived antigens to CD8(+) T cells is not solely dependent on IEC pyroptosis.
The innate immune system detects pathogens and initiates adaptive immune responses. Inflammasomes are central components of the innate immune system, but whether inflammasomes provide sufficient signals to activate adaptive immunity is unclear. In intestinal epithelial cells (IECs), inflammasomes activate a lytic form of cell death called pyroptosis, leading to epithelial cell expulsion and the release of cytokines. Here, we employed a genetic system to show that simultaneous antigen expression and inflammasome activation specifically in IECs is sufficient to activate CD8(+) T cells. By genetic elimination of direct T cell priming by IECs, we found that IEC-derived antigens were cross-presented to CD8(+) T cells. However, cross-presentation of IEC-derived antigen to CD8(+) T cells only partially depended on IEC pyroptosis. In the absence of inflammasome activation, cross-priming of CD8(+) T cells required Batf3(+) dendritic cells (conventional type one dendritic cells [cDC1]), whereas cross-priming in the presence of inflammasome activation required a Zbtb46(+) but Batf3-independent cDC population. These data suggest the existence of parallel inflammasome-dependent and inflammasome-independent pathways for cross-presentation of IEC-derived antigens.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据