4.8 Article

Rif2 protects Rap1-depleted telomeres from MRX-mediated degradation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

期刊

ELIFE
卷 11, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

eLIFE SCIENCES PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.74090

关键词

Rap1; Rif2; Ku complex; telomere; telomerase; tlc1-tm; S; cerevisiae

类别

资金

  1. CONACYT scholarship
  2. EMBO Short-Term Fellowship
  3. Carl Trygger Foundation
  4. Erik Philip-Sorensen Foundation
  5. Royal Physiographic Society in Lund
  6. Vidi grant from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reveals that disruption of Rap1 at telomeres leads to defects in telomere length regulation and capping, while tlc1-tm cells grow similarly to wild-type cells. Rif2 and the Ku complex work in parallel to prevent tlc1-tm telomere degradation, highlighting the redundant mechanisms that may explain the rapid evolution of telomere components in budding yeast species.
Rap1 is the main protein that binds double-stranded telomeric DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Examination of the telomere functions of Rap1 is complicated by the fact that it also acts as a transcriptional regulator of hundreds of genes and is encoded by an essential gene. In this study, we disrupt Rap1 telomere association by expressing a mutant telomerase RNA subunit (tlc1-tm) that introduces mutant telomeric repeats. tlc1-tm cells grow similar to wild-type cells, although depletion of Rap1 at telomeres causes defects in telomere length regulation and telomere capping. Rif2 is a protein normally recruited to telomeres by Rap1, but we show that Rif2 can still associate with Rap1-depleted tlc1-tm telomeres, and that this association is required to inhibit telomere degradation by the MRX complex. Rif2 and the Ku complex work in parallel to prevent tlc1-tm telomere degradation; tlc1-tm cells lacking Rif2 and the Ku complex are inviable. The partially redundant mechanisms may explain the rapid evolution of telomere components in budding yeast species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据