相关参考文献
注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science
Brian A. Nosek et al.
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY (2022)
Improving preclinical studies through replications
Natascha Ingrid Drude et al.
ELIFE (2021)
Methodology over metrics: current scientific standards are a disservice to patients and society
Ben Van Calster et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2021)
Assessment of transparency indicators across the biomedical literature: How open is open?
Stylianos Serghiou et al.
PLOS BIOLOGY (2021)
Experiments from unfinished Registered Reports in the Reproducibility Project: Cancer Biology
Timothy M. Errington et al.
ELIFE (2021)
Reproducibility in Cancer Biology: Challenges for assessing replicability in preclinical cancer biology
Timothy M. Errington et al.
ELIFE (2021)
A Simple, Interpretable Conversion from Pearson's Correlation to Cohen's for d Continuous Exposures
Maya B. Mathur et al.
EPIDEMIOLOGY (2020)
Rethinking the incentive system in science: animal study registries Preregistering experiments using animals could greatly improve transparency and reliability of biomedical studies and improve animal welfare
Celine Heinl et al.
EMBO REPORTS (2020)
New statistical metrics for multisite replication projects
Maya B. Mathur et al.
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY (2020)
What is replication?
Brian A. Nosek et al.
PLOS BIOLOGY (2020)
Changing how we evaluate research is difficult, but not impossible
Anna Hatch et al.
ELIFE (2020)
Argue about what a replication means before you do it
Brian A. Nosek et al.
NATURE (2020)
Heterogeneity in Direct Replications in Psychology and Its Association With Effect Size
Anton Olsson-Collentine et al.
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN (2020)
AlzPED: Improving the predictive power and translational validity of preclinical testing of candidate therapeutics in Alzheimer’s disease animal models
Shreaya Chakroborty et al.
Alzheimers & Dementia (2020)
Many Labs 5: Testing Pre-Data-Collection Peer Review as an Intervention to Increase Replicability
Charles R. Ebersole et al.
ADVANCES IN METHODS AND PRACTICES IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2020)
ANIMAL REGISTRIES AIM TO REDUCE BIAS
Monya Baker
NATURE (2019)
What's next for Registered Reports?
Chris Chambers
NATURE (2019)
Reproducibility and Rigor in Animal-Based Research
Malcolm Macleod et al.
ILAR JOURNAL (2019)
A comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in simulated random-effects meta-analyses
Dean Langan et al.
RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS (2019)
The harmonic mean p-value for combining dependent tests
Daniel J. Wilson
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2019)
Identification of and Correction for Publication Bias
Isaiah Andrews et al.
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW (2019)
Small-Sample Methods for Cluster-Robust Variance Estimation and Hypothesis Testing in Fixed Effects Models
James E. Pustejovsky et al.
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & ECONOMIC STATISTICS (2018)
A re-evaluation of fixed effect(s) meta-analysis
Kenneth Rice et al.
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY (2018)
An empirical analysis of journal policy effectiveness for computational reproducibility
Victoria Stodden et al.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2018)
Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings
Richard A. Klein et al.
ADVANCES IN METHODS AND PRACTICES IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2018)
Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015
Colin F. Camerer et al.
NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR (2018)
Using OSF to Share Data: A Step-by-Step Guide
Courtney K. Soderberg
ADVANCES IN METHODS AND PRACTICES IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2018)
Comment on Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science
Daniel T. Gilbert et al.
SCIENCE (2016)
Response to Comment on Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science
Christopher J. Anderson et al.
SCIENCE (2016)
Evaluating replicability of laboratory experiments in economics
Colin F. Camerer et al.
SCIENCE (2016)
A Framework for Improving the Quality of Research in the Biological Sciences
Arturo Casadevall et al.
MBIO (2016)
Badges to Acknowledge Open Practices: A Simple, Low-Cost, Effective Method for Increasing Transparency
Mallory C. Kidwell et al.
PLOS BIOLOGY (2016)
Many Labs 3: Evaluating participant pool quality across the academic semester via replication
Charles R. Ebersole et al.
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY (2016)
Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis: An Evaluation of Selection Methods and Some Cautionary Notes
Blakeley B. McShane et al.
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2016)
What Should Researchers Expect When They Replicate Studies? A Statistical View of Replicability in Psychological Science
Prasad Patil et al.
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2016)
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science
Alexander A. Aarts et al.
SCIENCE (2015)
Promoting an open research culture
B. A. Nosek et al.
SCIENCE (2015)
Risk of Bias in Reports of In Vivo Research: A Focus for Improvement
Malcolm R. Macleod et al.
PLOS BIOLOGY (2015)
Likelihood of Null Effects of Large NHLBI Clinical Trials Has Increased over Time
Robert M. Kaplan et al.
PLOS ONE (2015)
The Availability of Research Data Declines Rapidly with Article Age
Timothy H. Vines et al.
CURRENT BIOLOGY (2014)
How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set
Iain Chalmers et al.
LANCET (2014)
Biomedical research: increasing value, reducing waste
Malcolm R. Macleod et al.
LANCET (2014)
Facilitating transparency in spinal cord injury studies using data standards and ontologies
Vance P. Lemmon et al.
NEURAL REGENERATION RESEARCH (2014)
Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer
Annie Franco et al.
SCIENCE (2014)
Distinguishing between Exploratory and Confirmatory Preclinical Research Will Improve Translation
Jonathan Kimmelman et al.
PLOS BIOLOGY (2014)
An open investigation of the reproducibility of cancer biology research
Timothy M. Errington et al.
ELIFE (2014)
Meta-regression approximations to reduce publication selection bias
T. D. Stanley et al.
RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS (2014)
Investigating Variation in Replicability A Many Labs'' Replication Project
Richard A. Klein et al.
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY (2014)
Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience
Katherine S. Button et al.
NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE (2013)
Replication and reproducibility in spinal cord injury research
Oswald Steward et al.
EXPERIMENTAL NEUROLOGY (2012)
Reforming Science: Methodological and Cultural Reforms
Arturo Casadevall et al.
INFECTION AND IMMUNITY (2012)
A call for transparent reporting to optimize the predictive value of preclinical research
Story C. Landis et al.
NATURE (2012)
Raise standards for preclinical cancer research
C. Glenn Begley et al.
NATURE (2012)
Scientific Utopia: II. Restructuring Incentives and Practices to Promote Truth Over Publishability
Brian A. Nosek et al.
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2012)
Replications in Psychology Research: How Often Do They Really Occur?
Matthew C. Makel et al.
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2012)
Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling
Leslie K. John et al.
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2012)
Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets?
Florian Prinz et al.
NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY (2011)
Replication in Prevention Science
Jeffrey C. Valentine et al.
PREVENTION SCIENCE (2011)
False-Positive Psychology: Undisclosed Flexibility in Data Collection and Analysis Allows Presenting Anything as Significant
Joseph P. Simmons et al.
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2011)
MassBank: a public repository for sharing mass spectral data for life sciences
Hisayuki Horai et al.
JOURNAL OF MASS SPECTROMETRY (2010)
Data sharing, small science and institutional repositories
Melissa H. Cragin et al.
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES (2010)
Why most published research findings are false
JPA Ioannidis
PLOS MEDICINE (2005)