4.8 Article

Investigating the replicability of preclinical cancer biology

相关参考文献

注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。
Review Psychology

Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science

Brian A. Nosek et al.

Summary: Replication is an important and often misunderstood practice in psychology, which is gaining more recognition. It is crucial for research progress as it allows for the validation and development of theories. Assessing replicability is productive for generating and testing hypotheses, identifying weaknesses, and promoting innovation. In recent years, replication projects have revealed failures to replicate many published findings and highlighted sociocultural challenges, ultimately prompting improvements in research practices.

ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY (2022)

Article Biology

Improving preclinical studies through replications

Natascha Ingrid Drude et al.

Summary: The purpose of preclinical research is to guide the development of novel diagnostics or therapeutics, with results from animal models informing decisions on human studies. Despite apparent efficacy demonstrated in preclinical studies, a significant number of clinical trials still fail. Large-scale replication studies are currently investigating factors influencing the robustness of preclinical research.
Editorial Material Health Care Sciences & Services

Methodology over metrics: current scientific standards are a disservice to patients and society

Ben Van Calster et al.

Summary: Medical research quality remains poor due to the longstanding undervaluation of methodology in science. Despite various improvement initiatives, the overall system is disjointed and slow to adapt, requiring top-down actions from journals, universities, funders, and governments to break the cycle.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2021)

Article Biochemistry & Molecular Biology

Assessment of transparency indicators across the biomedical literature: How open is open?

Stylianos Serghiou et al.

Summary: The study introduces an automated approach to identify indicators of transparency in scientific research and applies it on a large scale of biomedical literature, showing significant improvements in some aspects of transparency. It also maps transparency across various fields, countries, journals, and publishers.

PLOS BIOLOGY (2021)

Article Biology

Experiments from unfinished Registered Reports in the Reproducibility Project: Cancer Biology

Timothy M. Errington et al.

Summary: Out of the remaining 11 papers, four initiated experimental work but stopped without any outcomes, two resulted in incomplete outcomes due to unexpected challenges, and five had only some experiments completed due to technical or methodological challenges. This provides evidence of the challenges in repeating preclinical cancer biology experiments and the replicability of completed experiments.
Article Biology

Reproducibility in Cancer Biology: Challenges for assessing replicability in preclinical cancer biology

Timothy M. Errington et al.

Summary: The study found that replicating preclinical research in cancer biology poses various challenges and barriers, such as lack of key data, insufficient experimental descriptions, and difficulties in obtaining author assistance, limiting the number of successful replications.
Letter Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

A Simple, Interpretable Conversion from Pearson's Correlation to Cohen's for d Continuous Exposures

Maya B. Mathur et al.

EPIDEMIOLOGY (2020)

Article Social Sciences, Mathematical Methods

New statistical metrics for multisite replication projects

Maya B. Mathur et al.

JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY (2020)

Article Biochemistry & Molecular Biology

What is replication?

Brian A. Nosek et al.

PLOS BIOLOGY (2020)

Editorial Material Multidisciplinary Sciences

Argue about what a replication means before you do it

Brian A. Nosek et al.

NATURE (2020)

Article Psychology

Heterogeneity in Direct Replications in Psychology and Its Association With Effect Size

Anton Olsson-Collentine et al.

PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN (2020)

Article Psychology

Many Labs 5: Testing Pre-Data-Collection Peer Review as an Intervention to Increase Replicability

Charles R. Ebersole et al.

ADVANCES IN METHODS AND PRACTICES IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2020)

Article Biology

The Brazilian Reproducibility Initiative

Olavo B. Amaral et al.

Editorial Material Multidisciplinary Sciences

ANIMAL REGISTRIES AIM TO REDUCE BIAS

Monya Baker

NATURE (2019)

Editorial Material Multidisciplinary Sciences

What's next for Registered Reports?

Chris Chambers

NATURE (2019)

Review Veterinary Sciences

Reproducibility and Rigor in Animal-Based Research

Malcolm Macleod et al.

ILAR JOURNAL (2019)

Article Mathematical & Computational Biology

A comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in simulated random-effects meta-analyses

Dean Langan et al.

RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS (2019)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

The harmonic mean p-value for combining dependent tests

Daniel J. Wilson

PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2019)

Article Economics

Identification of and Correction for Publication Bias

Isaiah Andrews et al.

AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW (2019)

Article Economics

Small-Sample Methods for Cluster-Robust Variance Estimation and Hypothesis Testing in Fixed Effects Models

James E. Pustejovsky et al.

JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & ECONOMIC STATISTICS (2018)

Article Social Sciences, Mathematical Methods

A re-evaluation of fixed effect(s) meta-analysis

Kenneth Rice et al.

JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY (2018)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

An empirical analysis of journal policy effectiveness for computational reproducibility

Victoria Stodden et al.

PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2018)

Article Psychology

Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings

Richard A. Klein et al.

ADVANCES IN METHODS AND PRACTICES IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2018)

Article Psychology, Biological

Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015

Colin F. Camerer et al.

NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR (2018)

Article Psychology

Using OSF to Share Data: A Step-by-Step Guide

Courtney K. Soderberg

ADVANCES IN METHODS AND PRACTICES IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2018)

Editorial Material Multidisciplinary Sciences

Comment on Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science

Daniel T. Gilbert et al.

SCIENCE (2016)

Editorial Material Multidisciplinary Sciences

Response to Comment on Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science

Christopher J. Anderson et al.

SCIENCE (2016)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Evaluating replicability of laboratory experiments in economics

Colin F. Camerer et al.

SCIENCE (2016)

Editorial Material Microbiology

A Framework for Improving the Quality of Research in the Biological Sciences

Arturo Casadevall et al.

Article Biochemistry & Molecular Biology

Badges to Acknowledge Open Practices: A Simple, Low-Cost, Effective Method for Increasing Transparency

Mallory C. Kidwell et al.

PLOS BIOLOGY (2016)

Article Psychology, Social

Many Labs 3: Evaluating participant pool quality across the academic semester via replication

Charles R. Ebersole et al.

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY (2016)

Article Psychology, Multidisciplinary

Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis: An Evaluation of Selection Methods and Some Cautionary Notes

Blakeley B. McShane et al.

PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2016)

Article Psychology, Multidisciplinary

What Should Researchers Expect When They Replicate Studies? A Statistical View of Replicability in Psychological Science

Prasad Patil et al.

PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2016)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science

Alexander A. Aarts et al.

SCIENCE (2015)

Editorial Material Multidisciplinary Sciences

Promoting an open research culture

B. A. Nosek et al.

SCIENCE (2015)

Article Biochemistry & Molecular Biology

Risk of Bias in Reports of In Vivo Research: A Focus for Improvement

Malcolm R. Macleod et al.

PLOS BIOLOGY (2015)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Likelihood of Null Effects of Large NHLBI Clinical Trials Has Increased over Time

Robert M. Kaplan et al.

PLOS ONE (2015)

Article Biochemistry & Molecular Biology

The Availability of Research Data Declines Rapidly with Article Age

Timothy H. Vines et al.

CURRENT BIOLOGY (2014)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set

Iain Chalmers et al.

LANCET (2014)

Editorial Material Medicine, General & Internal

Biomedical research: increasing value, reducing waste

Malcolm R. Macleod et al.

LANCET (2014)

Editorial Material Multidisciplinary Sciences

Make mouse studies work

Steve Perrin

NATURE (2014)

Editorial Material Cell Biology

Facilitating transparency in spinal cord injury studies using data standards and ontologies

Vance P. Lemmon et al.

NEURAL REGENERATION RESEARCH (2014)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer

Annie Franco et al.

SCIENCE (2014)

Article Biochemistry & Molecular Biology

Distinguishing between Exploratory and Confirmatory Preclinical Research Will Improve Translation

Jonathan Kimmelman et al.

PLOS BIOLOGY (2014)

Article Mathematical & Computational Biology

Meta-regression approximations to reduce publication selection bias

T. D. Stanley et al.

RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS (2014)

Article Psychology, Social

Investigating Variation in Replicability A Many Labs'' Replication Project

Richard A. Klein et al.

SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY (2014)

Review Neurosciences

Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience

Katherine S. Button et al.

NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE (2013)

Article Neurosciences

Replication and reproducibility in spinal cord injury research

Oswald Steward et al.

EXPERIMENTAL NEUROLOGY (2012)

Editorial Material Immunology

Reforming Science: Methodological and Cultural Reforms

Arturo Casadevall et al.

INFECTION AND IMMUNITY (2012)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

A call for transparent reporting to optimize the predictive value of preclinical research

Story C. Landis et al.

NATURE (2012)

Editorial Material Multidisciplinary Sciences

Raise standards for preclinical cancer research

C. Glenn Begley et al.

NATURE (2012)

Article Psychology, Multidisciplinary

Scientific Utopia: II. Restructuring Incentives and Practices to Promote Truth Over Publishability

Brian A. Nosek et al.

PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2012)

Article Psychology, Multidisciplinary

Replications in Psychology Research: How Often Do They Really Occur?

Matthew C. Makel et al.

PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2012)

Article Psychology, Multidisciplinary

Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling

Leslie K. John et al.

PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2012)

Letter Biotechnology & Applied Microbiology

Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets?

Florian Prinz et al.

NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY (2011)

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Replication in Prevention Science

Jeffrey C. Valentine et al.

PREVENTION SCIENCE (2011)

Article Biochemical Research Methods

MassBank: a public repository for sharing mass spectral data for life sciences

Hisayuki Horai et al.

JOURNAL OF MASS SPECTROMETRY (2010)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Data sharing, small science and institutional repositories

Melissa H. Cragin et al.

PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES (2010)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Why most published research findings are false

JPA Ioannidis

PLOS MEDICINE (2005)