4.5 Article

Sensible Heat and Latent Heat Flux Estimates in a Tall and Dense Forest Canopy under Unstable Conditions

期刊

ATMOSPHERE
卷 13, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/atmos13020264

关键词

sensible heat flux; latent heat flux; in situ sensing; aspen forest

资金

  1. Ministerio de Ciencia, Economia y Universidades of Spain [RTI2018-098693-B-C31]
  2. Key R&D Program of Jiangsu Province [BE2021340]
  3. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions [PAPD-2018-87]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This method estimates the sensible heat flux for unstable atmospheric conditions using half-hourly measurements as input, avoiding the need for estimating other parameters. It shows potential for remote sensing applications and demonstrates high accuracy without bias in all data.
A method to estimate the sensible heat flux (H) for unstable atmospheric condition requiring measurements taken in half-hourly basis as input and involving the land surface temperature (LST), H-LST, was tested over a tall and dense aspen stand. The method avoids the need to estimate the zero-plane displacement and the roughness length for momentum. The net radiation (Rn) and the latent heat flux (lambda E) dominated the surface energy balance (SEB). Therefore, lambda E was estimated applying the residual method using H-LST as input, lambda ER-LST. The sum of H and lambda E determined with the eddy covariance (EC) method led to a surface energy imbalance of 20% Rn. Thus, the reference taken for the comparisons were determined forcing the SEB using the EC Bowen ratio (BREB method). For clear sky days, H-LST performed close to H-BREB. Therefore, it showed potential in the framework of remote sensing because the input requirements are similar to current methods widely used. For cloudy days, H-LST scattered H-BREB and nearly matched the accumulated sensible hear flux. Regardless of the time basis and cloudiness, lambda ER-LST was close to lambda E-BREB. For all the data, both H-LST and lambda ER-LST were not biased and showed, respectively, a mean absolute relative error of 24.5% and 12.5% and an index of agreement of 68.5% and 80%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据