4.5 Article

Dynamics of Vegetation Net Primary Productivity and Its Response to Drought in the Mongolian Plateau

期刊

ATMOSPHERE
卷 12, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/atmos12121587

关键词

net primary productivity; drought; response; Mongolian Plateau

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [42061070]
  2. High-level introduction of talent research start-up fund in Inner Mongolia Normal University [2019YJRC002]
  3. Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China [61631011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found an increasing trend in NPP on the Mongolian Plateau from 1982 to 2014, while drought intensity was also on the rise. The decrease in NPP and SPEI in Mongolia was larger than that in Inner Mongolia, and vegetation showed different responses to SPEI in different seasons.
Vegetation net primary productivity (NPP) is an important aspect of the global carbon cycle, and its change is closely related to climate change. This study analyzed the spatial-temporal variation of the standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index (SPEI) and NPP in the Mongolian Plateau, and investigated the effect of drought on NPP. To this end, NPP was simulated using the Carnegie-Ames-Stanford Approach (CASA) model. The results showed that from 1982 to 2014, NPP exhibited an upward trend in different seasons, and a significant increasing trend in most areas in the growing season and spring. The degree of drought also showed an increasing trend in each season. Moreover, the decrease in NPP and SPEI in Mongolia was larger than that in Inner Mongolia. Vegetation showed a positive correlation with SPEI in the growing season and summer, but a negative correlation in the other seasons. Moreover, the impact of drought on vegetation in the growing season showed a lag effect, whereas the lag response was inconspicuous during the early stages of the growing season. Different vegetation NPP responded strongly to the SPEI of the current month and the previous month.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据