4.5 Article

Making the invisible visible: tracing the origins of plants in West African cuisine through archaeobotanical and organic residue analysis

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s12520-021-01476-0

关键词

Organic residues; West Africa; Nok culture; Pottery; Leafy greens

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [BR 1459/7, NE 408/5]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study uses archaeobotanical evidence from ancient sites and organic residue analysis to reveal the diversity and complexity of plant components in West African cuisine, suggesting an early origin for the plant component of modern-day West African cuisine around the middle of the second millennium BC.
West African cuisine has long been known for its distinct ingredients and flavours, often enhanced by the addition of a large and diverse range of plant foods. A traditional meal comprises a starchy staple cooked in a pot and served with a sauce prepared from vegetables, fish and/or meat, often accompanied by pulses. However, reconstructing the antiquity of the full range of plant use by ancient peoples, using archaeobotanical remains, in West Africa is challenging due to their somewhat fragile nature. Hence, there is a strong bias toward food plants that survive in charred condition, rendering invisible those that easily decompose, such as leafy plants and tubers. Here, we combine organic residue analysis of 458 prehistoric vessels, with archaeobotanical evidence from ten sites of the prehistoric Nok culture, Nigeria, spanning a period of around 1500 years, beginning around the middle of the second millennium BC and terminating in the last century BC. Our results reveal a range of highly diverse and complex lipid distributions denoting the preparation and processing of various plant types, including leafy vegetables or 'greens', cereals, pulses and underground storage organs, possibly yams. Here, we render previously unidentifiable leafy plant use visible and suggest an early origin for the plant component of modern-day West African cuisine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据