4.5 Article

Variation in economic specialization as revealed through the study of Pottery Neolithic faunal assemblages from the southern Levant

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s12520-021-01446-6

关键词

Livestock management; Southern Levant; Pottery Neolithic; LSI; Domestication; Wild species

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The research reveals that during the Early and Late Pottery Neolithic periods in the southern Levant, livestock were mainly utilized for meat rather than their secondary products. The animal economy in each site relied on a combination of livestock and wild species, with varying degrees of reliance between sites, especially in the Late Pottery Neolithic period.
Our research examines the extent of animal husbandry between the Early and the Late Pottery Neolithic period in the southern Levant. Based on the faunal analysis of several assemblages from sites dated to the Jericho IX/Lodian (7800-7500 Bp) and Wadi Raba cultures (7500-6500 Bp), located in diverse geographic zones, it expands upon the current knowledge regarding the status of livestock exploitation and the extent of hunting. We expected some measure of exploitation of secondary products, as previous studies show that intense use of livestock for milk had already emerged in several places in Europe and the Near East by the 8th millennium BC. Our examination of the species abundance, herd demography, and changes in body size of the main livestock animals and wild species in multiple sites showed that livestock were utilized mainly for meat, and not for their secondary products. Additionally, while the animal economy in all sites relied on a combination of livestock and wild species, the extent of reliance on each source varied greatly between sites, especially in the Late Pottery Neolithic. Finally, our findings demonstrate that the economy of the Late Pottery Neolithic (Wadi Raba) of the southern Levant is more similar to the Early Pottery Neolithic (Jericho IX/Lodian) than to the later Chalcolithic Ghassulian.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据