4.2 Article

Building an agroecological model to understand the effects of agrochemical subsidies on farmer decisions

期刊

AGROECOLOGY AND SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS
卷 46, 期 5, 页码 712-735

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/21683565.2022.2039837

关键词

Choice dynamics; peasant; subsidies; rationale; modeling; fragile system

资金

  1. CONACYT
  2. Chulalongkorn University Visiting Professorship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents a simple simulation model to explore the effects of agrochemical subsidies on farmers' decisions about their plots. The model suggests that using agrochemicals may lead to an unstable pattern in the economic and ecological balance, resulting in negative consequences for household savings and production.
We present a simple simulation model whose purpose is to explore qualitatively and heuristically the effects that agrochemical subsidies could have on the type of decisions farmers make about their plots (keeping other variables fixed). We use elements of Chayanovian thinking and ecological complexity as a basis, considering that this decision is made by families with heterogeneous preferences in a context with a dynamic that, on the one hand, is non-linear for ecological cycles, and, on the other hand, is chaotic in terms of the interaction with the market. The model describes the relationship between the ecological-productive potential or capacity of a plot and the total production, as well as the effect of management (agroecological or agrochemical) on the ecological capacity. We explore the effect of agrochemical subsidies on this decision and discuss the consequences of these public policy instruments on the lives of farming families. The model shows that by using agrochemicals, both the economy and the ecological balance of the plot enter an unstable pattern with harmful long-term consequences, as there could be a significant reduction in household savings. The same effect is observed on production, since the ecological capacity tends to decrease throughout the simulation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据