4.6 Article

Chasing Down the Eu2+ Ions: The Delicate Structure-Property Relationships in the Ultra-Narrow Band Phosphor K1.6Na2.1Li0.3[Li3SiO4]4:Eu2+

期刊

ADVANCED OPTICAL MATERIALS
卷 9, 期 24, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adom.202101643

关键词

cyan gap; Eu; (2+); high color gamut; light-emitting diodes; UCr; C-4; (4)-type phosphors; ultra-narrow band emission

资金

  1. Projekt DEAL

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Eu2+-activated phosphors of the UCr4C4 structure type have shown promise as narrow band phosphors for use in novel backlighting LEDs with high color gamut, with recent research focusing on understanding the complex emission spectrum and structural features of these materials.
Eu2+-activated phosphors of the UCr4C4 structure type have emerged as promising new (ultra-)narrow band phosphors. Especially the UCr4C4-type alkali lithosilicates have caused a sensation in the field of phosphor research in the recent years due to their consistent (ultra)narrow-band luminescence in the cyan and green range that can pave the way to novel backlighting LEDs with high color gamut. The compound K2Na2[Li3SiO4](4):Eu2+ stands out with a strikingly narrow emission in the cyan range (<0.2 eV or <30 nm full width at half maximum in the energy or wavelength scale, respectively) but the position of the Eu2+ ions within this structure has been so far controversial. High-resolution photoluminescence spectroscopy at 10 K reveals a complex emission spectrum with seven emission bands in the violet to green range. Combination with single-crystal X-ray diffraction (SCXRD) demonstrates that the cation channels in the structure also contain Li+ ions. The presence of emission bands in the violet and blue spectral range reveals that the Eu2+ ions also occupy the available K sites in the structure independently confirmed by advanced ligand field calculations. This study demonstrates that a combination of SCXRD, photoluminescence spectroscopy, and theory can help elucidate advanced structural problems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据