4.6 Article

Techno-economic Analysis and Life-Cycle Analysis of Renewable Diesel Fuels Produced with Waste Feedstocks

期刊

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
卷 10, 期 1, 页码 382-393

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c06561

关键词

Waste-to-energy; Greenhouse gas emissions; Marginal abatement cost; Renewable diesel; Minimum fuel selling price; Counterfactual scenarios

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Bioenergy Technologies Office (BETO)
  2. Vehicle Technologies Office (VTO), under the DOE CoOptimization of Fuels and Engines Initiative
  3. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Bioenergy Technology Office and Office of Vehicle Technologies [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  4. U.S. Department of Energy [DEAC3608GO28308, DE-AC05-76RL01830]
  5. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explores the economic and environmental implications of using wet waste feedstocks to produce biofuels, focusing on two pathways from yellow grease and swine manure. The swine manure HTL pathway shows negative GHG emissions due to credits of avoided emissions from conventional swine manure management. The commercialized yellow grease HEFA pathway benefits from carbon credits in the California Low Carbon Fuel Standard market.
Wet waste feedstocks represent an important category of resources that could be utilized to produce biofuels. Diversion of the wet waste resources from going through conventional waste management practices to utilization as feedstocks for energy production also benefits from avoided cost and pollutant emissions of waste management and disposal. This study investigates the economic and environmental implications of producing bioblendstocks for mixing controlled compression ignition engines from two waste-to-fuel pathways: hydroprocessed esters and fatty acids (HEFA) from yellow grease and swine manure hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) followed by biocrude upgrading. Detailed process models were developed for both pathways, which informed the techno-economic analysis and life-cycle analysis. Conventional swine manure management practice was also modeled in detail as the business-as-usual scenario for the swine manure HTL pathway. The estimated minimum fuel selling prices were $1.22/gasoline liter equivalent (GLE) and $0.94/GLE for the yellow grease to HEFA and swine manure HTL pathways, respectively. The life-cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of the two pathways were 11.2 and -33.3 g of CO(2)e/MJ, respectively, for the yellow grease to HEFA and swine manure HTL pathways. The credits of avoided emissions from conventional swine manure management were the main reason for the negative GHG emissions of the swine manure HTL pathway. The marginal GHG emissions abatement costs were estimated to be $116-$270/tonne CO(2)e and $5-$103/tonne CO(2)e for the yellow grease HEFA and swine manure HTL pathways, respectively, for a diesel price ranging between $0.5/GLE and $0.9/GLE. Since the yellow grease HEFA pathway is already commercialized, it can benefit from the $200/tonne carbon credit in the California Low Carbon Fuel Standard market, which could help the yellow grease HEFA pathway to achieve near-zero marginal GHG emissions abatement cost.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据